Wilson’s underclass
theory emphasizes external causes to be the determinant of the underclass
behavior. In his explanation, Wilson
identifies that a change in availability of opportunities would override what
is seen as deviant behavior due to cultural dysfunction. Availability of job opportunities and
positive external causes would change the cultural norm that is attributed to
underclass deviant behavior (Schiller, 2008).

While collecting
responses of students from poor and non-poor families on their expectations to
complete college education, Wilson’s research observed that students from both
the poor and non-poor families had high aspirations to complete college
education. However, only a reduced
percentage of students from the poor families actually complete the college
education as compared to children from non poor families (Schiller, 2008).
Pedersen (2002) explains
behavior therapy, which seeks to train individuals on how to interact with cultural
influence on behavior. Dysfunctional culture acts only as a status quo in
determining the deviant behaviors of underclass. If external causes would be
brought in to influence or help the underclass attain their aspirations and
expectations, they would deviate from the acclaimed dysfunctional culture. Dysfunctional
culture is created by the repeated inability to attain the expectations meaning
if the expectations could be attained, then the whole cultural setting would
change resulting to a positive change in behavior.
Pedersen, P. B. (2002). Counseling
across cultures. Thousand Oaks [u.a.: SAGE.
Schiller,
B. R. (2008). The economics of poverty and discrimination. Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
No comments:
Post a Comment